Dr PreZiGen

For healthcare practitioners

Context first. Then an evidence-linked direction.

Share the clinical question and context. Our experts integrate pathology, biomarkers, genomics and treatment history into a concise, referenced snapshot for your team's decision-making.

Submit a clinical question See the snapshot format
Abstract illustration of a DNA double helix connected to a network of cells

AI intelligence × Human judgement

Evidence-linked · Patient-specific · Expert-reviewed

Clinical context before recommendations

The same variant can mean different things in different patients.

That's why every review starts with the full picture, not just the molecular report.

  • Clinical summary
  • Pathology
  • Biomarkers
  • Genomic report
  • Treatment history
  • Exact clinical question

Precision-oncology snapshot

A concise, referenced answer to your question

Findings are interpreted in context and placed on an evidence ladder, so established options are never confused with investigational ones.

  1. Established Supported by guidelines or regulatory approval in this setting.
  2. Alternative Reasonable evidence, often from other settings or smaller studies.
  3. Clinical trial Promising, but best accessed through a trial.
  4. Further testing Additional information needed before a direction is clear.

Dr PreZiGen · Sample interpretation format

Dr PreZiGen De-identified example

Precision oncology snapshot

Integrated molecular interpretation

Clinical question

Which molecular findings are clinically relevant, and what additional evidence should inform the next discussion with the treating team?

Example genomic findings table (illustrative only)
Finding Biological role How it is framed
Driver alteration (example) Oncogenic signalling Evidence tier and source cited
Tumour-suppressor change Loss of growth control Context and uncertainty stated
Co-occurring finding Possible resistance marker Flagged for expert discussion

Evidence-linked considerations

  • Established
  • Alternative
  • Clinical trial
  • Further testing
Expert review & sign-off — discussed with the treating team
Illustrative, de-identified example — not a treatment recommendation.

Expert-reviewed direction

Accountable humans sign every opinion.

  • AI-assisted evidence retrieval

    Structured search and annotation of literature, guidelines and trials.

  • Specialist interpretation

    Oncology, pathology and genomics expertise applied to your case.

  • Transparent uncertainty

    We state what is known, what is uncertain, and why.

  • Your decision

    The opinion supports — never replaces — the treating team's judgement.

Case submission

Start with the clinical question

Tell us your question without patient identifiers. If we can help, we'll accept the case and send you a secure portal link to upload the clinical documents.

  1. 1. Send a de-identified question here.
  2. 2. We confirm scope, fee and expected timeline.
  3. 3. Upload documents securely in the portal.
  4. 4. Receive an expert-reviewed snapshot.

Practitioner case enquiry

Do not include patient-identifying details or upload reports here. Once we accept the case you'll receive a secure portal link for documents.

Please don't share medical records or patient identifiers in this form — clinical documents are only accepted inside the secure portal.

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

Voice of experience

Verified patient and clinician experiences will appear here.

We only publish experiences that are genuine, verified and shared with explicit consent.

Coming soon